My 10 Suppressed Natural Cancer Cures

As I have been saying in previous articles the medical/pharmaceutical owned and controlled cancer establishment do not want you to know that ever since time immemorial there has been cheap, natural and non-toxic cures for cancer.

If any of these non-patentable cures were allowed to be known to the public at large then, as a result, they would seriously undercut the medical/pharmaceutical owned and controlled cancer establishment's business. So, whether it has been through making these successful alternative cures with their related practitioners illegal or paying off the mainstream media to blackout, ignore or ridicule, even when knowing they do in effect cure cancer, the establishment have shown that money is more important to them than truth.

The establishment's treatment of cancer: chemotherapy, radiation and surgery largely achieve poor results and cancer is therefore only a major life-threatening illness because of the suppression of the highly effective cheap, natural and non-toxic cures.

So here's my list of 10 suppressed natural cancer cures. Indeed, this is not an exhaustive account and you may know others. Either way I encourage you to do your own research but beware of the deliberate misinformation media sources with their weak arguments and purposely left out relevant information to make the case against cheap, natural and non-toxic alternative cures look stronger or plausible. Some of them are secretly cancer establishment sponsored!

1. Royal (William) Rife's Cancer Machine

In the 1930's California microbiologist Royal Rife after many years put together a 'universal microscope' basically designed to focus on cancer cells by identifying their wave frequency of vibration being different to normal cells... The universal microscope could then be used to send beams of a specific frequency from a ray tube which zapped and killed the cancer cells. This Rife called the mortal oscillatory rate which was very successful in destroying cancer in patients. So successful, in fact, Rife's machine cured 16 out of 16 cancer patients and some had been hopeless cases.

However, into the 1940's and 50's well into the manufacture of the cancer machines, having established treatment clinics, Rife found himself caught up in a legal wrangle with the establishment's big boys such as the American Medical Association. In spite of Rife winning court cases... his equipment was finally laid to rest, seized by the authorities for illegal alternative practices in medicine.

2. Laetrile Cancer Treatment

Ernest Krebs learned that the isolated indigenous Hunsas people living at the foot of the Himalayas lived to very high ages before death. He found that apricot kernels was very much used in their diet, containing high vitamin B17 levels, which he theorised was responsible for contributing to no cancer recorded in this area. He made a refined (distilled) version of vitamin B17 and called it laetrile. It was found that laetrile or B17 destroyed the enzyme beta-glycosidase in the cancer cell's metabolic pathway and thus could cure cancer when using it as a therapy.

Bad science (deliberate?), politics, corporate greed and adverse publicity basically destroyed this great discovery from getting deserved recognition at large...

3. Harry Hoxey's Herbal Remedies

Successful businessman Harry Hoxey after curing his horse with cancer used the same paste-applied herbal remedy on people. His herbal formula had achieved 80% success over 80 years. In the 1960's his clinic in Texas was shut down for illegal practices... All for curing people of cancer. A former nurse working with Hoxey's remedy took the treatment to Mexico which still survives today.

4. Metabolic Nutritional Therapy

This is the idea that certain anti-cancer foods can be used as a strict dietary regime. Again this has been highly successful but the cancer establishment seldom mention nutrition: No money to be made there...

5. Gerson Therapy

This follows on from 4 in the respects that it is a form of metabolic nutritional therapy, using body detoxification to assist in the process. Gerson therapy originally devised by Max Gerson was fully recognised in congress from hearings in the 1920's but was later struck of the record. One can only assume because of the threat it posed to undercutting the medical/pharmaceutical's businesses and less governmental revenues... if got to the public at large.

6. Otto Warburg Oxygen Therapy

Another great individual with his pioneering work in the 1930's was biochemist Otto Warburg. He was unjustly ridiculed by the establishment for coming up with the finding that oxygen is an environment that cancer cells don't like. Warburg said that cancer cells manifest in an oxygen deprived environment. Why do you think you never hear of cancer of the heart? It's because the heart contains oxygen rich blood... This has been ignored by the establishment.

7. John Baird Proteolytic Enzyme Therapy

At the turn of the 20th century Scottish doctor Baird noticed that during early foetal development the mother's placental cells behave like cancer cells in that they show rapid growth. By pregnancy day 56, when the foetus has formed its pancreas, it produces pancreatic enzymes that switch off this rapid growth. So basically Baird theorised, given that these placental cells behave like cancer cells in that they exhibit rapid growth, like the foetal cells, could the cancer cells be switched off by pancreatic enzymes? The answer is yes! Yes, cancer could be successfully treated using pancreatic enzymes. However, in spite of its success, the treatment was laid to rest invalidated and radiation therapy was chosen by the establishment instead...

8. Tullio Simoncini Cancer Therapy

Brilliant tenacious Italian doctor Tullio Simoncini has been subjected to huge pressures from the establishment to succumb: In spite of the ridicule and attempts at legal action he continues his work today focussing on treating cancer as a fungus called Candida resulting from a poor immune system. Simoncini found that antifungal treatment did not work. The solution was not only cheap but simple. He gave patients sodium bicarbonate internally through an endoscope (tube). This allows the bicarbonate to go directly to the cancer. As mentioned above this great cancer breakthrough has however been largely ignored by the cancer establishment.

9. Stanislaw Burzynski Antineoplastons

There is a movie available to see on U-Tube called "Cancer Is a Serious Business." This award winning scandalous true story movie made my cry. It shows how a medical man &biochemist Dr Stanislaw Burzynski discovered a cancer cure using gene therapy, but had to deal with the mite of the American Food and Drug Administration who tried to criminalise him for his practices. A 14 year 60 million dollar US tax payer's money legal battle ensued... The fact that he had help saved many lives, curing sometimes even hopeless cancer cases was never the issue! The real issue was the fact that Dr Burzynski was undercutting the cancer establishment's business...

10. Anti-Oxidants

The late great scientist twice Nobel Prize winner Linus Pauling was turned down when he tried to get funding with his colleagues for further research on vitamin C and its role in fighting cancer: He found that leukaemia sufferers had low levels of vitamin C. When these sufferers were given frequently high doses of vitamin C they went into remission (recovery)... Pauling also discovered that frequent vitamin C high dosing stops the migratory pathways that cancer cells use to metastasise (spread). It is inconceivable to me that this could be ignored but has been (and still is).

In summary

The above clearly shows that the medical/pharmaceutical establishment has the upper hand in controlling cancer. Power, political gain and profit are indeed the ulterior motives. I would encourage the reader to do his/her own study and learn to discern: For example, look at the mass media reports on cancer and ask yourself does this have vested interest. Ask yourself who stands to gain..?

By Paul A Philips

Does Baking Soda Really Cure Cancer?

When alternative cancer therapies are thought of, it may be a bit of a surprise to think that something as simple a baking powder (bicarbonate of soda, sodium bicarbonate) that has hundreds of uses around the home may actually be a worthy contender. So why is it not widely touted as some miracle cure if it CAN actually cure cancer?

First of all, it must be acknowledged that the pharmaceutical industry is a multi-billion dollar industry that not only generates billions of dollars every year for itself, but also for local governments. So if it was common knowledge that something as simple as a $3 baking soda treatment could actually take the place of an industry $350,000 treatment, a devastating effect would be caused on the industry as a whole.

One of the major pioneers behind the alternative cancer cure theory using baking soda, is the Italian Doctor Tullio Simoncini, who believes that many forms of cancer (both local and remote) are of a fungi base, where the only remedy for their cure is therapy using sodium bicarbonate (baking soda). Although, these beliefs cannot be backed up by clinical trials, and relies solely on documented results of previous successes as evidence.

It is claimed that Simoncini has cured literally hundreds of cancer patients, primarily for throat, digestive tract, colon, rectal, intestine, and other cancers using sodium bicarbonate. Where the cancer has been caught early, and with a low incidence of metastasis (spread), 90% of patients have actually made a full recovery.

Because sodium bicarbonate is diffusible and holds no complicated structure, fungi can easily codify this fact, which in turn allows for the bicarbonate to rapidly disintegrate any mass (tumor) due to its ability to have a longer presence in situ, and the inability of the fungi to defend itself.

Strong doses of bicarbonate (500cc at 5% solution [a 20% increase or decrease may be applicable]) are continuously administered over a period of 7 - 8 days with zero tolerance of interruption, as masses of between 2 - 4 centimeters tend to begin to regress from between the third and fourth day, and collapse during the concourse of the fourth and fifth.

Although not all organs within the body can actually be reached by the bicarbonate due to the lack of sufficient dosage reaching its target, most of them can be. It is also worth mentioning that whilst treatment is being given to a particular area of mass within the body, other organs are not damaged in the process (as with traditional medicines) because of the harmless nature of the sodium bicarbonate, and no side-effects are experienced either.By Philip Albert Edmonds-Hunt

Brain Cancer: Diagnosis and Prevention

The very first diagnostic step is a neurological examination to check eye movement and vision, hearing, sensation, reflexes, balance and coordination, thinking and memory. After neurological examination is over expert may suggest imaging studies and laboratory test for further information about the tumor and its location. Diagnostic tests are often used after treatment to monitor the outcome and recurrence of tumors. Diagnosis for brain cancer may include computerized tomography scan known as CT or CT scan, magnetic resonance imaging or MRI, bone scan and lumbar puncture.

CT scan stands for Computerized Tomography: A CT scan directs x-rays from multiple angles to a specific body part like various cross sections of tissues and bony structures. This can help identify the tumor's location and can sometimes help to determine the tumor type. Additionally it can also detect swelling, bleeding or other conditions associated with the tumor. Magnetic resonance imaging combines computer technology, a magnetic field and radio waves to produce a two dimensional image of the patients anatomy. This process is radiation free and the radio waves are harmless. Positron emission tomography scans create color coded pictures of brain activity by measuring low dose radioactive levels. The PET scan measures the consumption rate of sugar substance in different parts of brain. This can be helpful in detecting recurrent tumor growth. Plain x-ray films of the head may be used to determine the condition of the head and the effect of the tumor on bony structures.

Brain cancer prevention can help person to prevent or reduce the seriousness of the disease they are affected with. There are certain steps that help to prevent the disease like exploring his or her family history and find out what diseases run in the family. If one finds any signs of the disease an immediate visit to the doctor is warranted. Avoiding things causing this serious disease like smoking, drinking alcohol and cell phones as cell phones give off radioactive waves which attack brain cells. Get a regularly health diet because healthier living promotes longer happier lives, read those books that guide you about how this serious disease is caused and what kind of symptoms they have in common. Make sure that our environment is clean as it is very beneficial to our overall health.

Brain cancer originates in the brain is called primary brain tumor. It occurs at any age. But most probably it happens in childhood and can lead to adult. It can spread and destroy nearby parts of brain. There are many instances where effects of brain cancer have spread to the brain from others parts of the body like breast cancer, liver cancer, lung cancer and so on. Brain cancer often occurs within the same family members, inheritance is also a responsible cause of brain cancer.

Treatment of brain cancer depends on the diagnosis. Brain cancer treatments involve combination of surgery, radiation and chemotherapy. Some tumors require several different surgical procedures, and some can be treated with radiation therapy. But the initial treatment of a brain tumor may include steroid medications to reduce growth and inflammation of brain tissue. Anticonvulsant medications may help to prevent or control illness. Drugs used in cancer chemotherapy specifically attack cells that promote division. These drugs are useful because cancer cells spend more of their time dividing and reproducing than normal cells do.-By: Mark Lee

New Cancer Drugs Uncovered

There are a number of new cancer drugs currently undergoing preliminary testing, which are in no doubt raising the hopes of many of those unfortunate enough be battling cancer at this time, as well as the hopes of their families & loved ones. But are these high expectations of life extension, or even of being completely cured truly justified by the claims of the medical industry on the capabilities of these new drugs?
For many of the people in the UK who saw the Tonight program on ITV, "Can We Beat Cancer" who find themselves in similar circumstances to those featured on the program will likely be hot on the case of the drugs mentioned. For me, on the other hand, having uncovered some truly horrific facts about chemotherapy which shed a very different light on orthodox treatments, there were immediate doubts in mind regarding this new wave of cancer drugs.
Firstly we are all so captivated by the term 'Drugs' when associated with serious diseases such as cancer, as if all the answers & even miracles are encompassed within this term. When used in conjunction with statements such as 'Medical Breakthrough' we become even more drawn in to the possibilities which may lie with such drugs, especially today with cancer being such a profound killer. Well, this is exactly the reaction intended by those who continue to convince the vast majority of the population that drugs are in fact the best, if not the only hope they have should they be diagnosed with cancer at any time in their lives.
The truth; cancer patient + cancer drugs = huge profits
In light of this, let's take a closer look at some of these new cancer drugs of which so many people are living in anticipation for, or who may in the future be putting their lives over to;

• Iressa (gefitinib)

Iressa may currently be used to treat people with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or NSCLC that has spread to other areas in the body. Iressa is what is known as an EGFR Inhibitor; this means it only works where mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor on the surface of cancer cells is detected.
There are distinct characteristics to the group of patients likely to have the level of EGFR needed to respond to such treatment; women, people who have never smoked, people with adenocarcinoma, and those of Asian ethnicity.
Iressa attaches itself to the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) on the surface of the cancer cell, preventing the attachment of epidermal growth factor (EGF) onto the receptor. EGF is a form of protein found in the body & once attached to a receptor, an enzyme called tyrosine kinase (TK) is formed. This enzyme instigates the cancer cell's ability to grow & divide, causing the cancer to spread, through a chemical process triggered off within the cancer cell it's self.
Iressa has shown good results in many cancer patients initially, however this tends to be followed by a relapse. This is most likely down to the ability of cancer cells to become resistant to drugs they are treated with. I have read medical reports of patients achieving full remission through the usage of Iressa, only for the cancer to return & for this same line of treatment to be found completely ineffective the second time around. As Iressa is mostly only used following the failed attempts of treating with chemotherapy, there is little hope of any forms of treatment being successful the second time around.
Known Side Effects
Nausea & Vomiting - Usually treated with anti-sickness medication.
Diarrhea - Usually controlled with further medication.
Skin rashes - Acne-like rashes, dry, itchy, sore & irritated skin.
Vision Problems - Pain, redness of the eyes, blurred vision, itching & soreness of the eyes, conjunctivitis.
Fatigue - Extreme fatigue & lack of energy.
Loss of Appetite - Possibly resulting in weight loss & may be linked to feelings of extreme weakness.
Hair & Nails - Loss of hair & loose, brittle nails.
Increased Blood Pressure - Symptoms are headaches, dizziness, blurred vision.
Lung Disease - Affecting around 1 in 100, this is a rare side effect, involving inflammation of the lungs. Symptoms include difficulty breathing, coughing & fever. This is very serious & can even result in death.
Conclusion
We are not looking at a potential cure here but merely at an extension of life. The ability of cancer cells to become resistant & to return with complete immunity to this drug means it does nothing more than 'bide us more time'.
The side effects are not pleasant, to say the least & once the cancer does return, as scientific testing has shown it almost inevitably does, what options are there left?
In my opinion; a great let-down for something instigating such high hopes among many sick people.

• PARP Inhibitors

Early results in the use of PARP inhibitors for treating breast cancer are said to be promising. PARP stands for poly(adenosine-disposphate-ribose) polymerase, an enzyme which repairs damage done to our DNA.
These drugs are said to work by "obstructing the ability of cells damaged by chemotherapy or through genetic mutations to repair themselves, causing tumour cells to die as a result" (WSJ).
PARP is found in all cells, including cancer cells & helps damaged cells to repair themselves. According to some doctors, because cancer cells have BRCA gene faults, if they can stop the PARP-1 working then these cells will be unable to repair themselves & will die. As healthy cells do not contain BRCA gene faults they should still be able to repair themselves despite the fact that PARP-1 is blocked in all cells of the body, not just cancer cells.
This treatment is still in the early trial stages, but could be a successful treatment for cancers with an abnormal BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene. This drug, when used in conjunction with chemotherapy may reduce the resistance of cancer cells to the chemotherapy. This treatment is only currently available to those with an abnormal BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene being treated for advanced-stage breast, ovarian, or prostate cancer through the participation in clinical trials.
Known Side Effects
As this is such a new treatment little is yet known about side effects, however there are a few that doctors do already know about; Drop in Blood Cell Count - Causing tiredness, shortness of breath, an increased risk of infection or bleeding problems.
Conclusion
Although it is stated that inhibiting PARP-1 should not affect the functioning of healthy cells this quite simply cannot be the case, as is shown in the fact that this can cause a drop in blood cell count. Surely this is evidence of damage to blood cells, which are unable to repair themselves? I find it very hard to believe that PARP would be found in all healthy cells if it was not in fact needed by them as part of their healthy functioning. We should be increasing the strength of our healthy cells & immune system, not obstructing their ability to repair themselves, common sense tells us we are just weakening our entire body in the hope of killing the cancer cells before the damage to our healthy cells kills us first. Cells are the making of our entire form, our bones, our blood, our skin as well as our internal organs, by denying them of something which they to maintain themselves we just leave ourselves wide open to infection & further illness.

• Herceptin (trastuzumab)

Another drug used against breast cancer & also stomach cancer; apparently herceptin can stop the growth of breast cancer & in some cases can even reduce the size of the tumour. Herceptin is only used either in conjunction with chemotherapy or by those who have already completed two courses of chemotherapy.
Herceptin is part of a group of cancer drugs called monoclonal antibodies. Monoclonal antibodies recognise & attach themselves to certain proteins which may be found on the surface of cancer cells & are said to trigger the immune system to attack these cells. While assisting in the elimination of certain types of cancer cells, these drugs are said to cause 'little' harm to healthy cells.
In around 20-30% of breast cancer & apparently in 6 - 40% of stomach cancer cases there are excessive amounts of a protein called HER2 found on the cancer cells, which encourages the growth of these cells. Such cases of these types of cancer are referred to as being HER2-positive, where breast cancer patients are concerned this can be very aggressive & fast growing. Herceptin attaches itself to the HER2 protein on the surface of cancer cells & prevents the epidermal growth factor protein from attaching itself, the epidermal growth factor triggers the chemical reaction within the cancer cell causing it to grow & divide.
Known Side Effects
Common Side Effects:
Fatigue - this can last anything between 6 months - 1 year after treatment, although gradually decreases over time.
Flu-like Symptoms - Nausea, sickness, headache, fever & chills may be experienced & are said to subside after a few hours following treatment. These side effects are usually counteracted with further medication.
Allergic Reaction - Affects around half of patients, usually reduces across further treatments. Symptoms include fever, chills, skin rash, hives, itching, wheezing, headache, sickness, flushes, faintness, breathlessness & difficulty breathing.
Diarrhea - Usually treated with further medication. Affects around 1 in 3 people.
Heart Problems - Fast & irregular heart beat & is therefore unsuitable for patients with a history of heart disease or high blood pressure.
Pain - Abdominal, chest, joint & muscle pain may be experienced.
Less Common Side Effects:
Reduced White Blood Cell Count - Causes an increased risk of bacterial infection, which in some cases may be life-threatening. Symptoms of infection are headaches, feeling cold and shivery, aching muscles, coughing, sore throat, & possibly pain when passing urine.
Lung Problems - Coughing & respiratory distress.
Heart Damage - May cause heart damage, affects around 1 in 25 people, or even heart failure.
Liver Problems - Usually monitored with regular blood tests.
Insomnia - difficulty sleeping.
Fertility Problems - Unknown effects on fertility (but still listed).
Conclusion
Considering the claims that this drug causes 'little harm to healthy cells,' when you look at the above side effects, this is clearly put into perspective. Anything which produces side effects like this & more commonly according to some reports than widely published, is harmful & damaging to our cells & our long term health.
Another strong-point; this drug is only used with or after chemotherapy. Chemotherapy causes significant damage to our body & kills more people than cancer. Surely to use this in the first place is beyond all reason, let alone in conjunction with another drug with such awful side-effects like almost any one of the above! Everyone knows the poor quality of life which results from chemotherapy, especially from repeated treatment, I can only dread to think about the suffering people may endure through a combination of chemotherapy & herceptin.
A fair few of the side effects mentioned are treated with 'further medication.' Further discomfort & damage to our body can be the only real result of this, even if initial relief is felt.
Medical Industry figures indicate a 50% increase in the survival rate of those using herceptin against breast cancer; unfortunately just more misleading statistics. The true figure is just 12%.
Additionally, this drug is currently being tested for its effectiveness against other types of cancer & has actually increased the death rate by 2.5%.
Overall Conclusion
We are not looking at any real new concepts in the fight against cancer here, just the same old 'drugs,' upon 'drugs,' upon 'drugs.' The side effects of & potential dangers of all of these new drugs are profound & would appear to be most unpleasant. I personally would never even consider touching them, I won't say "even if my life depended on it," because it never would, my life will always depend on 'my own lifestyle choices,' not drugs prescribed to me by any doctor.
When hearing statements about these drugs being set to potentially benefit thousands of cancer patients & you consider that 1 in 4 of the population is directly affected by cancer, this is a lot of people, even if 3-4% of them did benefit from them -this would still be thousands of people! As it is medical statistics but these figures much higher, but again these statistics are in fact flawed in many ways. One example of this is the 40-50% survival rate of chemotherapy patients, what is not always made clear is that this is only over a five year period. If you were to take into account how many people live the rest of their lives completely cancer free & never die of cancer, the treatment, or through any indirect cause from the treatment, this figure is just 3%! This is due to the increased susceptibility to cancer that chemotherapy causes, far more often than not it does return in the future & this time the chances of survival are far less.
In this day & age & with the advanced levels of science, is this the best they can come up with? The truth is that there are many scientist whose research is dedicated to the greater good of humanity, but as the medical industry has superior credibility among the vast majority of the population & with their findings being made readily available to us, if not pushed on us, people simply do not hear of or even take notice of alternative research.
The real cure for cancer:
There are, in reality, many, very real cures for cancer but they are just simply overlooked by most people who put their faith & indeed their lives in the hands of their oncologist alone. Perhaps we should remember that these people, although no doubt they are acting with the best of intention, are trained in 'medical school' on the usage of 'drugs' to treat cancer. They do not have knowledge or experience in natural treatment options & therefore now is surely the time for us to take control of our own fate by educating ourselves on other methods of treatment that are proving successful for hundreds of thousands of people worldwide. There are so many stories written by people who have cured themselves after they were deemed incurable by their medical professionals & some have even recovered after being literally on their death-bed.
The main aspect to consider when attempting to cure cancer is that certain lifestyle adjustments need to be made, something was not working for you or you would not have become ill & the thing I am talking primarily about is diet. Changing the diet alone can be enough to reverse many cases of cancer, especially if it is in the early stages & always the best place to start. If you are not prepared to give up foods you like, or are not prepared to give this a try, then the true desire to get well again is not there. This course of action has no painful side effects, only that it can make you feel better & better over time. Certain foods contain nutrients that directly attack cancer cells, others boost the immune system response & also when following a cancer diet you are 'starving' the cancer cells while 'feeding' healthy cells, giving your body the best opportunity of wiping out the cancer.
Cancer Killing Supplements:
In addition to your diet & for a more aggressive attack on cancer it is a good idea to add cancer fighting supplements to your daily regime. Certain supplements are over 100,000 times stronger in their healing properties as well as cancer fighting ability than chemotherapy.
Top Supplement Recommendations:
These are the best cancer fighting supplement combo's available at this time.
The numbers in brackets equal how many bottles should make one months supply.

• Vortexia, Creation, Quzu (PrugX, BLA): The first three provide an extremely powerful combination in terms of boosting the immune system response & vibrational frequencies of cells for increased health & healing. Add on PrugX & BLA for the most potent cancer-killing combination of products available on the market today.


• PrugX, BLA, MC2 Combo: PrugX & BLA are Energetic Medicine types & are formulated through the principles of Quantum Physics, which states that; all matter is ultimately energy, as indeed is every thought, which Quantum Physics has proved & energetically enhanced medicine works on level with these energies as well as those of disease in the elimination of the latter. (3,3,2, / 4,4,2 / 6,6,3)

.
By Amanda Sharpe